Pittsburgh Catholic Home
Pittsburgh Catholic News and Features
Pittsburgh Catholic Local/State News
Pittsburgh Catholic National/World News
Pittsburgh Catholic Columnists
Pittsburgh Catholic Editorial
Pittsburgh Catholic Letters
Pittsburgh Catholic Events
School News
About Pittsburgh Catholic
Pittsburgh Catholic History
Advertising on Pittsburgh Catholic
Pittsburgh Catholic Online Resources
Pittsburgh Catholic Subscribe Now
File Transfer
Pittsburgh Catholic Celebrate Life title=
First Communions
Life Moments
Pittsburgh Catholic Facebook

Parishes Click Here
Human Interest Story Idea? Click Here

Charity Golf Outings

Parish Festival Guide

Diocesan Cemeteries

Pilgrimage to the Holy Land

Thanksgiving Reflection

Friday, August 28, 2015
Marketplace Savings & More

News & Features

Moral dimensions in debt-ceiling debate
archived from: 2013-10-18
by: Mark Pattison

Christians praying for justice and compassion for the poor

WASHINGTON - Through rain and heat during the government shutdown, representatives of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops joined a Faithful Filibuster of Christians who pledged to stand near the Capitol when Congress is in session and read from more than 2,000 Bible passages that command justice and compassion for the poor.

The vigil, held on United Methodist property across the street from the Capitol, was organized by the Circle of Protection, an ecumenical advocacy group for the poor that the ISCCB belongs to. Kathy Saile, USCCB director of social development, said the Circle of Protection cares less how the stalemate is resolved than that it doesn’t target the poor. For the USCCB’s part, she added, it would like to see an accord include a more comprehensive accommodation for religious organizations with regard to the Health and Human Services’ mandate on abortion and contraceptive coverage.

Though the religious bodies in the Circle of Protection don’t agree on all issues, they are united in the belief that every economic decision has a moral dimension. That belief has deep roots in Catholic moral theology.

Do you shop at Store A, with higher prices, or Store B, which has a reputation for treating its workers badly? Do you put your money in a bank or a credit union? Do you shop local? Buy American?

The same is true with one of the biggest economic decisions the United States has ever faced: Do we increase the national debt ceiling, or allow the federal government’s borrowing power to run out? And what are the implications of either choice?

It’s a script many Americans have seen before: A Democratic-led White House and Senate, fending off political assaults from a Republican-led House on issues from the “fiscal cliff” to sequestration to the federal government shutdown, with both sides taking matters to the brink. Yet somehow this issue is less about another political rerun than the effects of the choices made by elected officials.

“There is a very ethical and moral concern here,” said David Fiorenza, an economist and professor of economics at Villanova University, whose specialty is in public sector and urban economics.

“And it’s really people who are in need. People who really do need Medicaid, or because they’ve exhausted all other possibilities of assistance. Children who still do not have parents at the age of 18. It’s a moral duty for the United States to make sure those people are covered every month.”

For Alan Gin, an economics professor at the University of San Diego, “the moral equation is if you tell somebody you’re going to engage in a financial transaction with somebody, you’re going to pay them” — and that means everybody from debt holders to Social Security recipients.

“There is some talk among some people that the government should first pay the bondholder, paying interest on the principal,” Gin added. But “how do you prioritize among the other categories? How do you define who gets paid and who doesn’t?”

Charles Zech, another Villanova economics professor, told Catholic News Service that the mere act of paying some and not others would be extremely hard to do in practice. “The government writes thousands of checks every day,” he said, “but it would be a nightmare to determine who goes first.” Zech said, “We’ve made some commitments here,” including to “those who have been lending us money” and “the American people.” Without a rise in the debt ceiling, he added, “we won’t be able to continue the program areas we’ve committed ourselves to, like the Social Security program.”

The range of options, according to Fiorenza, would all involve higher costs to the government and, by extension, taxpayers.

Not increasing the debt limit would result in the United States paying a higher interest rate for future borrowing, which would have to be taken into account the next time the debt ceiling needs to be raised. The cost of a federal jobs program to get people back to work would increase the budget deficit. If, as Fiorenza believes, it’s the private sector’s responsibility to create jobs, then the federal incentives made to employers to get those jobs created also cost a lot of money.

If there’s no debt-ceiling deal and the government defaults on its obligations, the choice becomes more stark. What gets paid first: people’s Social Security and veteran’s benefits, which in turn would keep the economy going, or interest on the debt to keep the country’s bond rating high and future borrowing costs low?

“This is the time the president should stand up and provide leadership and say, ‘This is what we’re going to do,’” Fiorenza said.

Zech said America is already hamstrung by its current debt, unable to launch broad-scale jobs programs that would get people off government assistance and paying taxes on their wages. Federal budget deficits have been pushed upward in the past five years because of joblessness aid, he noted; the current official unemployment rate is 7.3 percent, which does not take into account underemployed workers and those too discouraged to continue looking.

China buys a lot of U.S. debt, Zech said, because “it hardly does anything for its citizens” compared to U.S. initiatives.

Meanwhile, at the news conference for the Circle of Protection, the Rev. David Beckmann, a Lutheran minister who is executive director of Bread for the World, mused at what politics had come to.

“We could use some supernatural help, don’t you think?” he said.




Web www.pittsburghcatholic.org

home | news and features | columnists | editorial | letters | events | about us
advertising | online resources | subscribe now

© 2000 - 2015 Pittsburgh Catholic Publishing Associates
Subscribe Now: 1-800-392-4670

Click here to make Pittsburgh Catholic your homepage
(For IE users only)